Skip to content

Internal Motivation

April 16, 2015

Everyone is very excited about Congress’s elimination of the annual CYA known as The Doc Fix.  For a refresher go to the excellent piece at The Health Care Blog by Steven Findlay (http://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2015/04/08/sgr-rip-hopefully/).  Also in that legislation was an increasing push toward paying doctors for a group of patients, instead of by individual or by service, and giving monetary rewards to doctors who have better quality metrics.  This is supposed to save money by taking away the doctor’s incentive to see more patients and order more tests.  It is also supposed to increase quality by tipping the doctors, as I’ve discussed before.

OK, so I have a primary care doctor.  I am healthy, I eat right, I don’t smoke, I drink moderately (most of the time), I (used to) exercise.  Most men and women in my particular demographic do all of these things as well.  I have access to quality food, a gym membership, and health insurance.  Say my doctor participates in the proposed arrangement: she gets paid for a block of patients and, if those patients do well, she gets a bonus.  I love my PMD, but she would be getting a bonus for doing NOTHING.  I haven’t seen her in at least 5 years. The annual physical has been largely discredited, I haven’t reached the age-related screening test juggernaut, and I have the freedom to do everything I can to be healthy.

Let’s say I am not healthy.  I’m overweight, in my 50’s, I have a bad knee and had a heart attack last year.  My blood pressure is high and I quit smoking, but not soon enough.  Maybe I live in a low-income neighborhood and healthy food is not readily available.  I can’t exercise because my knee is bad, and also because I’m working two jobs, one during the day and one at night.  Let’s say my PMD has been seeing me once a month, has given me blood pressure medication, sent me to the office nutritionist and the social worker, checked my blood sugar and cholesterol, ordered my mammogram and colonoscopy, and kept the office open on Saturdays so I can actually make an appointment.  Despite these interventions I’m still overweight, my blood pressure is still high (because I can’t afford the co-pay), I haven’t had my screening tests (because I work two jobs and those guys don’t work weekends).  Now my PMD, who has worked her butt off for me, gets no bonus.

Health care administrators seem to be operating under the assumption that doctors won’t do good work without monetary incentives.  They also assume that people’s health depends on the good work of doctors.  They further assume that the quality indicators they have chosen actually indicate quality, and finally, that doctors have full control over their quality numbers.

But Shirie, you say, you are always complaining and moaning about how broken the system is.  How about you give us an alternative?  Not everyone can be an arrogant one percenter like you.

Provide health care for all patients who want it, change malpractice laws, and salary everyone.  Give every doctor a salary commensurate with the amount of money and time doctors spend in training so that they can support their student loans, their office overhead, and a moderate lifestyle.  So doctors go to school, graduate, and get good jobs.  If said doctors want to make more money they either a) quit and go into banking, or b) earn bonuses by taking care of sicker patients, or underserved populations, or the poor.  This solution offers the following advantages:

1. Doctors have good jobs that they don’t have to stress over.  Each patient gets the time they need and there are no production pressures. Quality rises as a result.

2. All patients have access to health care, so there are no uninsured folks waiting until their diseases are really bad before seeking help.  On the other hand, people who don’t choose to take charge of their health don’t penalize their doctors as a result.

3. Bonuses earned are for useful work, not data points.

4. Tests and medications are not ordered on-demand or because of fears about litigation.

5. All the overhead and CEO salaries for private insurance companies goes away.

But Shirie, you say, you arrogant one-percenter socialist, won’t that make doctors lazy, since they have no incentive to do a good job?  They can just while away their days because they get paid regardless.  Well, isn’t that what all the members of the US Congress are doing most of the time?  My kids’ kindergarten teacher gets a salary.  Why wouldn’t she do the same?  My mailman gets a salary.  What prevents him from wrinkling and/or soaking my mail and delivering it days late?  There is the threat of being fired, of course, but there is also the possibility that the teacher and the mailman like what they do and care about doing it well.  Why do we assume that doctors, or anyone else, will do a terrible job unless we incentivize and/or punish them?  We are not toddlers.  Most of us have an internal motivation to be good at what we do.  We just need to be given the right environment in which to do it.

 

Advertisements

From → Healthcare

9 Comments
  1. thetinfoilhatsociety permalink

    It’s just a bad idea, I agree. And this stupid idea about inserting yet another entity between the providers and the patient in the form of a payer is equally stupid. How much more money can our fearless leaders waste in pursuit of ‘saving money’??

  2. Pete Nunez permalink

    Well written and well thought out article.

  3. david permalink

    PRECISELY!!
    But of course that is HOW IT IS DESIGNED TO BE

  4. david permalink

    On the other hand I dont know how you find the piece on the SGR to be “excellent”.
    “This is, of course, the large-scale direction things are moving in the health system as a whole, with growing public and private payer momentum.
    Overall, MIPS moves things in the right direction. But there are some problems and gaps—one being that MIPS probably preserves too much of the existing fee-for-service system.”
    Merit based moves in the exact opposite direction you detail in your post!!
    \

    • I didn’t say I agreed with the piece in it’s entirety. I think it is a thorough examination of a complicated topic. But I like that you read both!

  5. Reblogged this on BeJoyousWomen and commented:
    Couldn’t agree more!

  6. As a patient, I sometimes receive an evaluation to fill out about my doctor. It is based primarily on a ten-point likert scale. One would think that 7 to 10 would be a good score but I have found out that only 9 and ten count as one point. All other scores count as zero. I know other people don’t know this as I have asked many people about the scoring system. What a shame. They think that if they mark 8 then the doctor gets eight points for that question. No, they get zero. From the time I found out that the scale was actually binary, I have only rated 9’s and 10’s unless there was sometime dramatically wrong. I might have rated one anesthesiologist low for giving a paralytic before the anesthesia but I wasn’t given an evaluation form for her. That was dramatically wrong.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Ideal Violinist

By Bayla Keyes

Eclectic Voices

Fiction, Monologues, Plays & More

Competing Diagnoses

How Americans talk about health care reform

Navigating Healthcare - Patient Safety and Personal Healthcare Management

A Guide to navigating Healthcare for parents, children and spouses who are concerned with managing their health and the health of their family

TurtleAndRobot.com

Children's Book Reviews

FutureDocs

Dr. Vineet Arora's thoughts on medical training, patient care, healthcare policy, with tips for trainees

Wright on Health

Making complex issues in health policy and health services research accessible to all...

Dr John M

cardiac electrophysiologist, cyclist, learner

KevinMD.com

Navigating the healthcare system

THCB

Navigating the healthcare system

Whole Mama

Navigating the healthcare system

medicine for real

Navigating the healthcare system

%d bloggers like this: