Skip to content

What, Me Worry? I Can’t Remember What I Was Worried About!

March 21, 2014

For those of you looking for something else to worry about, here’s fodder for your next dose of Valium.  For the past several years persistent rumors have been swirling about a possible connection between anesthesia and dementia.  No, not demented anesthesiologists, although I could think of a few.  There has been a recently flurry of activity in the caves in which neurobiologists roost, and the results are contradictory.

In June of last year the Mayo Clinic Proceedings published a study that found no association between anesthesia and dementia  (  Great!  Then a study out of Taipei ( published in July of last year suggests that having anesthesia for a procedure can double your risk of developing dementia within 3-7 years.  Yipes!  So who is right, and why such different results?

Let’s start with the study designs.  Both used a case-control design, in which each identified “case” is paired with a person who did not develop the disease in question, matched by age and gender.  In the Mayo Clinic study, the researchers started with identifying cases of dementia, then matched those with patients who didn’t get dementia, and looked for how much anesthesia each group had received.  In the Taipei study the researchers started with identifying cases of anesthesia and then prospectively looking for dementia.  Prospective means that you look for an outcome as it occurs, as opposed to looking at what has already occurred, as in a retrospective study.  The Taipei study’s inclusion of a prospective component arguably strengthens it’s validity.

The main outcome measure in both studies is dementia, approached from different angles.  Therefore, it would behoove both sets of researchers to have a darn good definition of dementia.  I have no idea how the Chinese researchers defined dementia, since the British Journal of Psychiatry doesn’t let you look at the full article.  The Mayo Clinic does:

“Information from the REP [Rochester Epidemiology Project, a large EMR database] was used to identify patients with primary dementia or AD [Alzheimer’s disease} in Olmsted County during the study period through the screening use of diagnostic codes followed by abstraction of relevant information from the medical record.  Using this information, 1 of 3 behavioral neurologists who had wide experience in dementia and epidemiologic research  reviewed the abstracted information to confirm the diagnosis of dementia, classify the type of dementia, and determine the year of onset.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(Fourth Edition) (DSM-IV) criteria were used to define dementia. Each element of the DSM-IV criteria was documented separately, and a diagnosis of dementia was made only if all 3 criteria were present. Alzheimer disease was distinguished from other types of dementia based on available clinical and laboratory data using DSM-IV criteria (dementia with gradual onset and continuing decline and absence of any other conditions that could explain the deficits) and National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria.”

OK then.  Pretty good definition I’d say.  Here’s the problem:  there are a million things that can cause dementia.  The list is as long as your arm and includes (according to, guess who? the Mayo Clinic!):

vascular disease (problems with blood flow to the brain)

Huntington’s disease or Lewy Body Disease

heart and lung problems (a little broad there, but includes circulation and oxygenation issues)

infections, immune disorders, metabolic disorders, and endocrine problems

nutrition, medications, heavy meal poisoning

brain injury, hydrocephalus (water on the brain), or undiagnosed subdural hematoma (bleeding in the brain)

So now let’s look at our inclusion criteria for these studies again.  Mayo Clinic: dementia, controls matched by age and gender.  Taipei: anesthesia, controls matched by age and gender.  Does age or gender appear anywhere in the above list of causes of dementia?  They do not.  Do any of the causes of dementia listed above show up in the control group criteria?  They do not.  We actually have no idea, based on these two studies, if the onset of dementia has anything at all to do with anesthesia.  There are too many uncontrolled variables.

Why is this even a question?  Why do we worry about anesthesia and dementia?  Well, we have no idea how anesthesia drugs work so we have no idea what the long-term effects are, other than that we’ve been doing anesthesia for 150 years.  So there’s that.  But the real reason researchers have asked the question about a possible relationship between anesthetic agents and dementia is something that we’ve recognized for a long  time but have recently invented a phrase for: post operative cognitive decline (POCD)

Post operative cognitive decline is a temporary decline in the ability to think and reason that is seen after major surgery, usually in the elderly.  POCD is not, I repeat not, dementia.  Dementia is a permanent and progressive condition.  POCD, while it can last months and be debilitating, is not dementia.  Again, there are a million reasons why patients might be cognitively impaired after major surgery, including all of the causes of dementia listed above.  It is important for patients and families to be aware of the possibility of POCD, but please do not worry that the anesthesia for your loved-one’s heart surgery or femoral bypass is going to cause dementia.  There is no evidence that it will.


From → Healthcare

  1. Phillip Gale permalink

    The issues in your article is the same that the general public is experiencing in all the “scientific” reports we hear about what foods are good for you and what are bad for you. The information given out by the media changes every few months. I like to think that I am a representative of the “general” public and I am fed up with the reports and view them as I view politicians. the reports reflect the spin of those financing the “research”. It all gives science a bad name to us who are not scientist. We, the general public do not trust your science any more.The two research projects need to be reconciled. Until then there is no new knowledge and nothing to cause anyone to change behavior in anesthesia.

    • Yes, you are right, people don’t trust the science. Some of this has to do with the lack of access to the actual research and some has to do with a lack of understanding about basic research principles like confounding variables. But the biggest culprit is the media, which sensationalizes results needlessly.

  2. If you don’t have an employer group health insurance you must have a private health insurance policy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

The Ideal Violinist

By Bayla Keyes

Eclectic Voices

Fiction, Monologues, Plays & More

Competing Diagnoses

How Americans talk about health care reform

Navigating Healthcare - Patient Safety and Personal Healthcare Management

A Guide to navigating Healthcare for parents, children and spouses who are concerned with managing their health and the health of their family

Children's Book Reviews


Dr. Vineet Arora's thoughts on medical training, patient care, healthcare policy, with tips for trainees

Wright on Health

Making complex issues in health policy and health services research accessible to all...

Dr John M

cardiac electrophysiologist, cyclist, learner

Navigating the healthcare system


Navigating the healthcare system

Whole Mama

Navigating the healthcare system

medicine for real

Navigating the healthcare system

%d bloggers like this: